IO U C ME
Ha I thought that was funny. Anyways, I am going to add to what everyone else most likely said and say that I lost my train of thought about 320458932875 times and said the same thing about 239742893 times. So yeah. Anyways. Practice makes perfect!
IOC Practice Planning
Recording
IOC Practice Planning
Recording
Grading Myself
Understanding: 6, Personally I feel as though my understanding of Macbeth is adequate but I meant to explain my analysis much more.
Literary Devices : 5, I explained a couple different uses of devices but could have done much more
Organization: 7, I thought my organization was good. I gave context, background info for the characters, and then provided analysis. That being said, I can always improve.
Language: 4, MY LANGUAGE COULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH BETTER. THAT WAS HORRIBLE.
Comments:
Waverly- Great job girl! I was so nervous too haha I messed up a ton. I agree with most of your grading for yourself. Nerves really mess us up. You could have provided much more analysis and at a greater depth. You did well with organization though I thought.
Sophie- You're a dork Sophie but we love you. Great job with the analysis. You went into good depth and provided context for your analysis. Loved it. In my opinion, your use of literary devices could have been tied in better but overall good job!
Hey Abby! Good job introducing the text with historical context and then context of the passage with in the text, this was really good. I really like that you keep bring up the idea of power throughout the text as this was such an important part of the text. Also, I like that you refer back to the prophecy from the beginning of the text to explain the events occurring in the passage. You address a couple of literary techniques used by Shakespeare, I think mainly characterization, but most of what you said was more narrative. Try to address more techniques used by Shakespeare and go in depth with them. Good job!
ReplyDeleteAbby:
ReplyDelete- A bit more lead-in about the text as a whole- title, author, year of publication, AND a brief summary- before zooming in to the passage itself.
- Good structure and organization; strong thesis. Be sure you keep linking back to those key ideas to prove how they are developed in the passage
- Make sure you are really looking at the passage ONLY- there are places where you are kinda veering into "book club"; additionally, make sure you are not just listing devices and are actually spending time analyzing (remember that rephrasing ISN'T analysis)
A: 5
B: 5
C: 4
D: 4